Category Archives: inthenews

Chron: Rail (METRO) v Bikeway (City)

I was a bit surprised when I read in this morning’s paper that “the bikeway plans [through the Heights] … could begin and be completed in 2008”. Could being the operative word. Next year is what they’ve said every year since 2000 or so.

Rails to Trails LogoThis bike trail rail line was cleared a decade ago and has been owned by TxDOT since then. The City’s been talking big about it being a bike trail that entire time. Now METRO is interested in the right-of-way. Was anyone really surprised that they weren’t aware of the City’s purported plans?

If the City had built out this route “next year” one of the previous times, perhaps METRO wouldn’t have been so out of the loop.

Continue reading

Wi-Fi Delays

Saturday,… Saturday?! If you wanted me to read something, why did you print it on Saturday, Chronicle? Make Saturday happen during the week and maybe I’ll read it. But,…

…oh, is this thing on?

Earthlink LogoAhem. So, as I am enjoying my Slothness and not chasing some job possibilities because I have one waiting to start. Earthlink is being all jittery like a first date. They won’t sign the papers with CenterPoint, because their requirements clock doesn’t start until they sign.

I thought they made a bad business decision when they got into this, but that’s their problem. (This technology is moving faster than the install rate.) Unfortunately, their new CEO is wary of blind, high risk growth. Maybe it’s time to look for a different job!

I think they’re going to try to renegotiate, which is only going to cost lots of time.

link: Earthlink’s Wi-Fi Delays Put Project in Question

cache:

Continue reading

Bye Rove

Bush RoveFrom the chron, David Corn:

But leaving is too good for Rove. He was Bush’s partner in the Iraq war, yet he [is] abandoning ship before the fight is done. Rove has argued that the Iraq war is essential for the survival of the United States. So how can he walk away with the war not won?

It is a mixed emotion to see Rove leave the White House. I certainly would have preferred it to happen years ago, and perhaps hanging from the gallows (or perhaps his own office ceiling, like a Chinese business man).

Just because he’s gone, doesn’t mean we can’t indict him for something.

You Got Your Politics in My Fluff

No, you got your Fluff in my Politics…

I was cracking open my morning paper to get to the crossword. Usually Monday and Tuesday is crossword day, and Wednesday-Friday are sudoku days. The crossword is in the Houston Chronicle’s “Star” section – it doesn’t have a title on the front, just a star. It’s the “fluff” section, where you go for comics, television and movie listings, and today, the lead article on doggie day care.

So, I’m making my way to the back and I find as the token article on page five (smashed in with movie times and box office returns) an article by Leonard Pitts Jr. I couldn’t find it on the chron web site, so rechecked the print version. It doesn’t list his affiliation but does have his email at herald.com. So, I did find the article on the Miami Herald’s site.

It’s a scathing indictment of the Bush administration (which admittedly is an easy thing to write these days). But I think the fact that it’s oozed into the entertainment section of the newspaper is telling of how despicable this administration has been.

Two great tastes that taste great together: Fluff and Politics.

(cached here for completeness)

The Bush presidency: Is nothing real?

Richard Nixon was a crook. He was also a liar and anti-Semite who sought to subvert the Constitution.

I wish he were president again. Continue reading

My Googlegänger: Prince Charming

So, I was reading this blogicle by an acquaintance of mine from college. He sometimes is used as a talking-head expert in the media. He has a Google Alert set for his name so he can see when and where he is talked about or quoted. He was giving a lecture in Amsterdam, and right after the lecture an alert went off – someone was liveblogging his lecture.

So, I though that was pretty interesting and wondered what might show up if I did that. Of course, I’m sure I get more false positives with my name that he does with his – Siva Vaidhyanathan. All my hits are from blogs I am involved in or from the 1940’s actor. I guess there could be worse things than being confused with the singing voice of Prince Charming.

Then I’m reading the Dictionary Evangelist’s blog about hacking English at Foo Camp. He has a few “new words” compiled from a session he gave. And one strikes me as applicable: Googlegänger. The other person who shows up in Google search results when people search for you.

Prince Charming is my Googlegänger!

Insecurity from New York



photo by etchasketchist

MgGuff points out: The New York Times covers the impending release of the iPhone, and can only say bad things. (“That iPhone Has a Keyboard, but It’s Not Mechanical” – John Markoff, June 13) Even the title sounds condescending: “That iPhone”! And he’s expounding upon “news” we’ve known for six months.

Is this true objective analysis, or is there some CA v NY in there? Are they resentful of Apple’s recent business acumen?

They try to tie the dead weight of Apple’s Worst Design Decision Evarâ„¢: the one button mouse. <sarcasm>We know that cost them a Billion dollars, just like they warn this will.</sarcasm>

The first quote of the piece shows an insecurity that seems quite fragile – without a keyboard, I’m afraid. Is this a true umbilical need Americans now have of technology (that it be rigid and unchanging?), or is an analyst just trying to show that he’s smarter than Steve Jobs?

“The tactile feedback of a mechanical keyboard is a pretty important aspect of human interaction,” said Bill Moggeridge, a founder of Ideo, an industrial design company in Palo Alto, Calif. “If you take that away you tend to be very insecure.”

Though, the article does finally represent the crux of the matter, two-thirds through the piece with an attributed unquote: “Dispensing with a physical keyboard has given software an increased importance over hardware in product design.”

This is the true key. If there is a perceived problem in the product – and this is version 1.0, so there will be – you don’t have to sell them the fixed product, you just rev the software.

Full NYT article cached: Continue reading